Case No. UKUT-169-(LC)-UTLC-Case-Number:-LC-2021-607

Fecha: 23-Jun-2022

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2022

The following cases are referred to in this decision:89 Holland Park Management Limited and others v Hicks [2013] EWHC 391 (Ch)89 Holland Park Management Limited v Hicks [2020] EWCA Civ 758Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 36Assethold Limited v Watts [2014] UKUT 537 (LC)Bretby Hall Management Company Limited v Pratt [2017] UKUT 70 (LC)Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd [2009] UKHL 38Fairbairn v Etal Court Maintenance Ltd [2015] UKUT 639 (LC) Gilje v Charlgrove Securities Limited [2003] EWHC 1284 (Ch)Hicks v 89 Holland Park (Management) Limited [2021] EWHC 930 (Comm)Kensquare v Boakye [2021] EWCA 1725Liverpool Quays Management Limited v Moscardini [2012] UKUT 244 (LC)McHale v Earl Cadogan [2010] HLR 412Phillips v Francis [2014] EWCA Civ 1395Radford v de Froberville [1977] 1 WLR 1262Sella House Limited v Mears [1989] 1 E.G.L.R. 65

Introduction
The appeal
The appellants’ lease
To employ all such surveyors builders architects engineers tradesmen solicitors accountants or other professional persons as may be necessary or desirable for the proper maintenance safety and administration of the Building.”
Without prejudice to the foregoing to do or cause to be done all such works installations acts matters and things as in the reasonable discretion of the Lessor may be considered necessary or advisable for the proper maintenance safety amenity and administration of the Building
The arguments on the appeal
Conclusion
Right of appeal