GROUNDS 1 AND 4
13.It is convenient to address together and first the first ground of appeal (for which the Council has permission) and the fourth ground (for which it has not). There is acknowledged on both sides to be some interplay between them. Having heard the argument, I consider that permission to appeal should be granted on the fourth ground, since it passes the test of being reasonably arguable, and I will address the argument on its merits.
- © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2022
- INTRODUCTION
- THE GROUNDS OF APPEAL
- GROUNDS 1 AND 4
- Background facts
- R (Gaskin) v Richmond-upon-Thames LBC
- The statutory provisions
- Begum
- Clark v Manchester City Council
- Hastings Borough Council v Turner
- Sheffield City Council v Hussain
- Herefordshire Council v Rhode
- Marshall v Waltham Forest LBC
- GROUND 2
- GROUND 3
- Vodafone 2 v Revenue and Customs Commissioners
- Right of appeal