© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
The following cases are referred to in this decision:R v Melladew [1907] KB 192Poplar Assessment Committee v Roberts [1922] 2 AC 93Fir Mill v Royton UDC (1960) R.R.C. 171Almond v Ash Brothers & Heaton Ltd [1969] 2 AC 366 Midland Bank plc v Lanham (Valuation Officer) [1978] RA 1 LTScottish & Newcastle v RF Williams (Valuation Officer) (RA/480/1993 & RA/484/1993)RF Williams (Valuation Officer) v Scottish & Newcastle Retail Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 185 [2001] LLR 732United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority v Highlands and Western Isles Valuation Joint Board Assessor LTS/VA/2003/78Woolway (VO) v Mazars [2015] UKSC 53 [2015] AC 1862SJ&J Monk v Newbigin [2017] UKSC 14 [2017] 1 WLR 851Wigan Football Club Ltd v Wayne Cox (Valuation Officer) [2019] UKUT 0389 (LC)Hewitt v Telereal Trillium Ltd [2019] UKSC 23 [2019] 1 WLR 3262Hughes (Valuation Officer) v Exeter City Council [2020] UKUT 0007 (LC)
- © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
- Introduction
- “the Power Station”
- “the Material Day”
- “the VTE”
- Representation, evidence and inspection
- “the Agreed Statement”
- The relevant background
- “CCGT”
- “TEC”
- “the PB Report”
- The issues in the appeal
- “the MCO”
- The legal framework – statutory provisions
- “Schedule 6”
- The legal framework – case law
- Discussion
- Conclusion
- Right of appeal