Upper Tribunal Lands Chamber
Case No. UKUT-26-(LC)-UTLC-Case-Numbers:-LC-2022-346
Fecha: 17-Ene-2023
“the RTM Company”
, but this expression is used subject to the question, which falls to be answered in this decision, as to whether the RTM Company does qualify as an RTM company, within the meaning of the right to manage provisions in the 2002 Act, in relation to the Property. 3.By their decision (
- © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
- Introduction
- “the Property”
- “the 2002 Act”
- “the FTT”
- “Assethold”
- “the RTM Company”
- “the FTT Decision”
- “the Terrace”
- “the Parts”
- “the Western Part”
- Section 72
- “Qualifying Premises”
- EVELINE ROAD RTM COMPANY LIMITED
- Flat 5 Briar Court, 440 London Road, London, SM3 8JE
- the premises known as the building or part of a building containing Flats A, B, C & D at 36 Eveline Road, Mitcham CR4 3LE
- “the RTM Application”
- “Broomfield”
- “Craftrule”
- The issues in the appeal and cross appeal
- “the 1993 Act”
- “Number 38”
- “the Self-Contained Part Question”
- Should the FTT Decision be set aside?
- The Self-Contained Part Question – discussion
- The President
- Right of appeal