Heading

Leeds Employment Tribunal
TRIBUNALS, COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT ACT 2007
AN APPEAL AGAINST THE FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL
(PROPERTY CHAMBER)
HOUSING – CIVIL PENALTY – mitigation – totality - landlord having accommodated difficult tenants at the local authority’s request – local authority’s policy on mitigation – fettering of discretion – policy that landlord must not benefit from non-compliance – total penalty reduced from over £49,000 to £26,500
BETWEEN:
MR HASAN KAZI
Appellant
-and-
BRADFORD METROPOLITAN DISTRICT COUNCIL
Respondent
Re: 2 Laisteridge Lane,
Bradford,
BD7 1RD
Upper Tribunal Judge Elizabeth Cooke
9 October 2023
Decision Date: 30 October
Mr Nick Peterken of NP Legal Service for the appellant
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
The following cases are referred to in this decision:
London Borough of Waltham Forest v Marshall [2020] UKUT 35 (LC)
R v Port of London Authority ex p Kynoch [1919] 1 KB 176
Sutton v Norwich City Council [2020] UKUT 90 (LC)
Sutton v Norwich City Council [2021] EWCA Civ 20
1.
- Heading
- Introduction
- The legal background
- Failure to comply with an improvement notice
- Failure to comply with HMO regulations
- Financial penalties
- The facts, and the decision in the FTT
- The appeal
- Ground 1: mitigation arising from the respondent’s approval of the premises for Mr Douglas
- Ground 2: the “final determinant” and the benefit to the landlord
- Ground 3: totality
- Discussion and conclusion
- Conclusions
![[2023] UKUT 263 (LC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_lnJS4Uj.png)