Heading

Bristol Magistrates’ Court and Tribunal Hearing Centre
TRIBUNALS, COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT ACT 2007
AN APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 84 OF THE LAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS – discharge – covenant preventing extension of bungalow without prior approval – bungalow extended in breach of the covenant – whether covenant was obsolete or secured practical benefits of substantial value or advantage – s.84(1)(a), (aa) and (c), Law of Property Act 1925 – modification granted
BETWEEN:
ANTHONY AND PATRICIA ROGERS
Applicants
-and-
MICHAEL DINSHAW (1)
IAN DINSHAW (2)
ANTHONY DINSHAW (3)
Objectors
Re: The Birches,
7 Redwood Grove,
Bude,
Cornwall, EX23 8EB
Upper Tribunal Member, Mr Mark Higgin FRICS
Bristol Magistrates’ Court and Tribunal Hearing Centre
2 November 2023
Decision Date: 8 January 2024
Mr James Jarvis, instructed by Paul Finn Solicitors for the applicants
Mr Michael Dinshaw in person and for the third objector
Mr Ian Dinshaw in person
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024
The following cases are referred to in this decision:
Mahon v Sims [2005] 3 E.G.L.R. 67
P&A Swift Investments v Combined English Stores Group Plc [1988] UKHL 3
Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council v Alwiyah Developments [1986] 52 P&CR 278
1.
![[2024] UKUT 00001 (LC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_lnJS4Uj.png)