Heading

TRIBUNALS, COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT ACT 2007
AN APPEAL AGAINST A DECISION OF THE FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL
(PROPERTY CHAMBER)
HOUSING – RENT REPAYMENT ORDER – statutory definitions of “person managing” and “person in control of” an HMO – effect of paragraphs 1 and 2 of Schedule 14 to the Housing Act 2004 when the person managing or in control of an HMO is a health service body within the meaning of section 9 of the National Health Service Act 2006
BETWEEN:
PHOEBE COTTAM AND SIX OTHERS
Appellant
-and-
LOWE MANAGEMENT LIMITED
Respondent
Re: The Gables, 2-4 Blackheath Park London SE3 9RR
Upper Tribunal Judge Elizabeth Cooke
Decision on written representations
Decision Date: 20 December 2023
Flat Justice for the appellant
Mr M Croskell for the respondent, instructed by Anthony Gold Solicitors LLP
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
The following cases are referred to in this decision:
Cabo v Dezotti [2022] UKUT 240 (LC)
Global 100 Limited v Jimenez and others [2023] EWCA Civ 1243
Hastings Borough Council v Braear Developments Limited [2015] UKUT 415 (LC)
Pollway Nominees Limited v Croydon London Borough Council [1987] 1 AC 79
R v London Borough of Lambeth ex p Clayhope Properties Limited [1988] QB 563
Truman, Hanbury, Buxton & Co. Ltd v Kerslake [1894] 2 Q.B. 774
1.
- Heading
- Introduction
- The legal background
- The factual background and the FTT’s decision
- The first ground of appeal: did the FTT misconstrue paragraphs 1 and 2 of Schedule 14?
- Permission to appeal on a further ground
- The second ground of appeal: was CCG the person in control of the premises?
- Conclusions
![[2023] UKUT 306 (LC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_lnJS4Uj.png)