Mr Reekie’s position
23.In presenting his appeal Mr Reekie referred to a number of matters concerning the conduct of the affairs of OCRA and its decision making which are outside the scope of this appeal. His key point was straightforward. Clause 1 required the cost of work to the lift to “reflect” the use made of it by different leaseholders. Since he made no use of the lift he considered that he could not be expected to contribute towards the cost of its refurbishment.