The grounds of appeal
24.The FTT gave permission to appeal on three separate issues:1.Whether the failure to serve notices of invitation to participate had invalidated the claim.2.Whether on the evidence it should have found that the claim notice failed to include the names of each person who was both a qualifying tenant and a member of the RTM company.3.If so, whether the failure to include the name of the qualifying tenant of flat 87 (who was a member of the company on the relevant date) in the claim notice invalidated the claim.
- © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
- Introduction
- The statutory procedure
- Notice inviting participation
- The facts
- The FTT’s decision
- The grounds of appeal
- Issue 1: The consequence of failing to serve notices of invitation to participate on all qualifying tenants who were not already members of the RTM company
- Issue 2: Did the evidence establish that the leaseholder of flat 87 was both a qualifying tenant and a member of the RTM company?
- Issue 3: Did the failure to include the name of the qualifying tenant of flat 87 in the claim notice invalidated the claim?
- Disposal
- Right of appeal