![[2023] UKUT 147 (LC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_lnJS4Uj.png){kind=logo}
Introduction
Introduction
The is an appeal by the owner of Meadowview Park, where the respondent Ms Esterhuyse lives in a mobile home pursuant to an agreement with the appellant made in 2017. The appeal is from the decision of the First-tier Tribunal refusing the appellant’s application to have the pitch fee for the respondent’s home increased in line with the retail prices index for the year 2022.
The appeal has been decided under the Tribunal’s written representations procedure. The appellant’s grounds of appeal were drafted by Mr Stephen Goodfellow of counsel; the respondent has chosen not to take part in the appeal.
- Heading
- Introduction
- The factual and legal background
- The FTT’s decision
- Ground 1: the FTT erred in fact in determining that the base had been cracked since 2018
- Ground 2:the FTT erred in fact or in law in determining that there had been a deterioration or decrease in the amenity of the site
- Ground 3: The tribunal erred in law and/or in the exercise of its discretion when applying the test as it failed to consider that, “unless this would be unreasonable” the presumed RPI linked increase
- Conclusions