Heading

[2023] UKUT 201 (LC) | Royal Courts of Justice Decision date: 24 August 2023 |
IN THE CENTRAL LONDON COUNTY COURT (J10CL393)
and
IN THE UPPER TRIBUNAL (LANDS CHAMBER) (LC-2022-300)
COMPENSATION – WATER – compensation under paragraph 5(1) of Schedule 21 to the Water Resources Act 1991 – nuisance – erosion – construction of works - change to the accustomed flow – powers and duties of the Environment Agency and of riparian owners
BETWEEN
DALE PAUL GOULD
Claimant
-and-
THE ENVIRONMENT AGENCY
Respondent
Re: Langley Mill,
Elms Hall Road,
Colne Engaine
CO6 2JL
Judge Elizabeth Cooke and Peter D McCrea FRICS FCIArb
13-15 June 2023
Royal Courts of Justice
John Bates, by direct professional access,for the Claimant
Ned Westaway and Caroline Daly, instructed by EA Legal Services,for the Respondent
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
The following cases are referred to in this decision:
Braganza v BP Shipping Limited [2015] UKSC 17
JN Hipwell v Szurek [2018] EWCA Civ 674
Marks & Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Trust Co (Jersey) Ltd [2015] UKSC 72
Roberts v Gwynfrai DC [1899] 2 Ch 608
Rooke’s Case (1597) 5 Coke Reports 99b
- Heading
- Introduction
- The Environment Agency
- The factual background
- The legal background to the claim; the common law and statutory duties of the Agency and of riparian owners
- The details of Mr Gould’s case
- The 2001 concrete weir
- The drop from the weir to the channel
- The gabion mattress
- Preferential flow and the accustomed flow of water
- The evidence from maps
- Measurements and observations
- The erosion in the side channel
- Conclusions
![[2023] UKUT 201 (LC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_lnJS4Uj.png)