Heading

Case No: LC-2023-684
AN APPEAL AGAINST A DECISION OF THE FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL (PROPERTY CHAMBER)
FTT REF: 2022/0118
14th June 2024
TRIBUNALS, COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT ACT 2007
Land Registration – Easements – claim to the acquisition of a right of way by prescription – what is required to prevent the use relied upon being use as of right – appeal against decision of the First-tier Tribunal that the wording of a sign erected on the servient land had been insufficient to prevent the use being as of right – cross appeal against the decision of First-tier Tribunal that the sign could have been read by anyone making their way over the servient land – decision that the First-tier Tribunal had been entitled, on the evidence, to find that the sign could have been read by anyone making their way over the servient land – cross appeal dismissed – decision that the First-tier Tribunal had been wrong to decide that the wording of the sign had been insufficient to prevent the use being as of right – appeal allowed and decision of the First-tier Tribunal re-made as a decision that the Respondents were not entitled to a right of way over the servient land on the basis of prescription
BETWEEN:
ADAM THOMAS NICHOLSON (1)
GAVIN STAFFORD (2)
Appellants
-and-
IAN REGINALD HALE (1)
JACQUELINE HALE (2)
Respondents
4 Derby Terrace,
The Park,
Nottingham,
NG7 1ND
The Chamber President, Mr Justice Edwin Johnson
14th May 2024
Paul Wilmshurst, instructed by direct access, for the Appellants
The First Respondent (Ian Hale), in person, for the Respondents
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024
The following cases are referred to in this decision:
Edwards v Bairstow [1956] AC 14
R (Oxfordshire & Buckinghamshire Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust and Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust) v Oxfordshire County Council [2010] EWHC 530 (Admin)
R v Oxfordshire County Council ex parte Sunningwell Parish Council [2000] 1 AC 335
Winterburn v Bennett [2016] EWCA Civ 482 [2017] 1 WLR 646
R (Lewis) v Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council [2008] EWHC 1813 (Admin)
Oxfordshire County Council v Oxford City Council [2004] EWHC 12 (Ch) [2004] Ch 253
Taylor v Betterment Properties (Weymouth) Ltd v Dorset CC [2012] EWCA Civ 250 [2012] 2 P&CR 3
Betterment Properties (Weymouth) Ltd v Dorset CC [2010] EWHC 3045 (Ch)
Southwark London Borough Council v Transport for London [2018] UKSC 63 [2020] AC 914
R (Barkas) v North Yorkshire County Council [2014] UKSC 31 [2015] AC 195
Regina (Newhaven Port & Properties Ltd) v East Sussex County Council [2015] UKSC 7 [2015] AC 1547
R (Beresford) v Sunderland City Council [2003] UKHL 60 [2004] 1 AC 889
- Heading
- Introduction
- The conventions of this decision
- The properties
- The Blue Land
- The Sign
- The claim to the right of way
- The Decision
- The Appeal
- The Cross Appeal
- Analysis of the Cross Appeal
- Analysis of the Appeal – the law
- The Appeal – analysis of Ground 1
- The Appeal – analysis of Ground 2
- Conclusions
![[2024] UKUT 00153 (LC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_lnJS4Uj.png)