Ground 2: the “fair proportion” contributions
Ground 2: the “fair proportion” contributions
This is one of the grounds on which the FTT refused permission. The point is that the FTT said it could not determine what was a “fair proportion” for flats 9 and 11, but that was not what it was asked to do. What it should have done, says the appellant, was to determine that 16/38 shared between these two flats could not possibly be fair. That is obviously correct and has already been dealt with; permission is granted and the appellant succeeds on this ground.
- Heading
- Introduction
- The legal background
- The factual background and the leases
- Section 4
- Section 5
- The proceedings in the FTT
- The appeal
- Ground 1: the FTT misconstrued section 35(4) (b)
- Ground 2: the “fair proportion” contributions
- Grounds 3: relevant considerations
- Ground 4: what is a “satisfactory” service charge provision
- Grounds 5, 6 and 7
- Disposal: the Tribunal’s substituted decision
- Conclusions
![[2024] UKUT 37 (LC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_lnJS4Uj.png)