Heading

LC-2023-393
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL AGAINST DECISIONS OF THE VALUATION TRIBUNAL FOR ENGLAND
VTE Refs: CHG100706377 and CHG100706379
Royal Courts of Justice,
Strand, London WC2A 2LL
12 November 2024
TRIBUNALS, COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT ACT 2007
RATING – HEREDITAMENT – advertising rights in railway stations – whether separately rateable in local list as being in the occupation of company to whom rights had been granted, or in central list as being in the occupation of Network Rail – s.64(2), 65(8), Local Government Finance Act 1988; reg.6, Central Rating List (England) Regulations 2005 – appeal allowed
BETWEEN:
KARL LIST
(Valuation Officer)
Appellant
- and -
NETWORK RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED
Respondent
Digital advertising right, Liverpool Street Station, London EC2M 7PY and
static advertising right, Victoria Station, London SW1E 5ND
Martin Rodger KC, Deputy Chamber President, and
Peter D McCrea OBE FRICS FCIArb
29-30 October 2024
Galina Ward KC and Hugh Flanagan, instructed by HMRC Solicitors, for the appellant
Daniel Kolinsky KC and Luke Wilcox, instructed by Dentons, for the respondent
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024
The following cases were referred to in this decision:
Cardtronics UK Ltd v Sykes (VO) [2020] UKSC 21
Case (VO) v British Railways Board [1972] RA 96
Esso Petroleum v Walker (VO) [2013] RA 355
Imperial Tobacco Company (of Great Britain and Ireland) Ltd v Pierson (VO) [1961] AC 463
Ludgate House Ltd v Ricketts (VO) [2021] 1 WLR 1750
O’Brien v Secker (VO) [1996] RA 409
Peak (VO) v Henlys (Bournemouth) Ltd (1959) 52 RIT 305
Westminster City Council v Southern Railway Co Ltd [1936] AC 511
![[2024] UKUT 351 (LC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_lnJS4Uj.png)