[2024] UKUT 375 (LC)

Case No: LC-2024-524

AN APPEAL AGAINST A DECISION OF THE FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL (PROPERTY CHAMBER)

FTT REFs: LON/OOAC/PH1/2023/0007, 9, 13, 29, 35, 38, 43, 47 and 53

22 November 2024

TRIBUNALS, COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT ACT 2007

PARK HOMES – PITCH FEE REVIEW – PROCEDURE – whether tribunal bound to allow CPI increase where no response has been made to a pitch fee review application – whether evidence received in one case may be taken into account by tribunal in another case heard at the same time – para.18, Ch.2, Pt.1, Sch.1, Mobile Homes Act 1983 – appeal dismissed

BETWEEN:

ARKLEY ESTATES LIMITED

Appellant

-and-

MS KATHLEEN MADIGAN (1)

MR R AND MRS S WEST (2)

MS SHIRLEY LEVENE (3)

MR TERRY STEWART (4)

MR RAYMOND BALDOCK (5)

MS GILLIAN GRIFFITHS (6)

MRS REEVE (7)

MR SEAN GALLAGHER (8)

MR MARIO MANCINI (9)

Respondents

Arkley Park,

Barnet EN5 3JQ

Martin Rodger KC, Deputy Chamber President

Determination on written representations

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024

The following cases are referred to in this decision:

Fairman v Cinnamon (Plantation Wharf) Ltd. [2018] UKUT 421 (LC)

Peabody Trust v Miss Carole Welstead [2024] UKUT 41 (LC)

Re Sayer [2014] UKUT 283 (LC)

Telchadder v Wickland Holdings Ltd [2014] UKSC 57

Wyldecrest Parks (Management) Ltd v Whitley [2024] UKUT 55 (LC)