![[2024] UKUT 56 (LC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_lnJS4Uj.png){kind=logo}
5(2) Was there satisfactory evidence of completion of the works?
5(2) Was there satisfactory evidence of completion of the works?
As we have seen, the FTT at its paragraph 23 said that there was no documentary evidence of the satisfactory completion of the work. Why that was a concern for the FTT is not understood. There was no need for the FTT to make any decision about whether the works had been completed, nor whether they were satisfactory.
The appellant points out that the FTT bundle included a Building Regulations Completion Certificate, and Electrical Installation Certificate, and a Fire Safety Certificate. They are all in the appeal bundle. Again the FTT’s finding was made against the weight of the evidence and is set aside.
- Heading
- Introduction
- The legal background
- The factual background and the proceedings in the FTT
- The proceedings in the FTT
- The appeal
- (1): The FTT was wrong to hold that a landlord whose title has not been registered cannot enter and do works on the property without the legal owner’s permission
- 5(1) Did the appellant give a proper explanation of the extent and cost of the works?
- 5(2) Was there satisfactory evidence of completion of the works?
- 5(3) Was the FTT wrong to dismiss the report and schedule of works of Mr Payne?
- Conclusions