Heading

Case No: LC-2022-600
AN APPLICATION UNDER
SECTION 84 OF THE LAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925
14 June 2024
TRIBUNALS, COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT ACT 2007
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS – DISCHARGE – site of former educational establishment in residential area – last used as a school in 1997 – buildings now demolished – planning permission for residential development – whether restrictions obsolete – whether restrictions secure practical benefits to objectors – whether discharge would cause injury – s.84(1), Law of Property Act 1925
BETWEEN:
STAFFORDSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL
Applicant
-and-
RESIDENTS OF THE ROE LANE
FARM HOUSING ESTATE
Objectors
Seabridge County Junior and Infants School,
Roe Lane,
Newcastle, ST5 3PR
Upper Tribunal Judge Elizabeth Cooke and Peter D McCrea FRICS FCIArb
14 May 2024
Edward Denehan, instructed by Staffordshire Legal Services, for the Applicant
The objectors were not represented
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024
The following cases are referred to in this decision:
Alexander Devine Children's Cancer Trust v Housing Solutions Ltd [2020] UKSC 45
Re Hextall’s Application (1998) 79 P&CR 382
Re Bass’s Application (1973) 26 P&CR 156
Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council v Alwiyah Developments (1986) 52 P&CR
Re O’Reilly’s Application (1993) 66 P&CR 485
James Hall and Company (Property Limited) v Maugham and Ors [2017] UKUT 240 (LC)
![[2024] UKUT 00174 (LC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_lnJS4Uj.png)