Heading

Case No: LC-2023-810
AN APPEAL AGAINST A DECISION OF THE FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL (PROPERTY CHAMBER)
FTT REF: LC-2023-391
Royal Courts of Justice, Strand
London WC2A 2LL
4 June 2024
TRIBUNALS, COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT ACT 2007
ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS CODE – JURISDICTION – whether operator entitled to apply for new Code agreement under Part 4 of the Code after losing right of renewal under Pt.2, Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 through delay in serving claim form – Paras 20, 27, 37, 40, Sch.3A, Communications Act 2003; Sch.2, Digital Economy Act 2017 – when unserved claim “finally determined” for purpose of s.64, Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 – appeal allowed
BETWEEN:
GRAVESHAM BOROUGH COUNCIL
Appellant
-and-
ON TOWER UK LIMITED
Respondent
The Hive, Hive Lane
Northfleet
Gravesend
Martin Rodger KC, Deputy Chamber President
24 May 2024
Jonathan Wills, instructed by Freeths LLP, for the appellant
Oliver Radley-Gardner KC, instructed by Gowling WLG (UK) LLP, for the respondent
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024
The following cases are referred to in this decision:
Aktas v Adepta [2011] QB 894
Arqiva Services Ltd v AP Wireless II (UK) Ltd [2020] UKUT 195 (LC)
Cornerstone Telecommunications Infrastructure Ltd v Compton Beauchamp Estates Ltd [2022] 1 WLR 3360
Crawley Borough Council v EE Ltd and another [2022] UKUT 158 (LC)
Johnson v Gore Wood & Co [2002] 2 AC 1
Piepenbrock v Associated Newspapers and others [2020] EWHC 1708 (QB)
Shotley Point Marina (1986) Ltd v Spalding [1997] 1 EGLR 233
Vodafone Ltd v Potting Shed Bar and Gardens Ltd & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 825
- Heading
- Introduction
- The issue
- The facts
- The relevant provisions of the Code
- Grounds of appeal
- Ground 1: Does the Code prohibit an operator which has exhausted its rights of renewal under the 1954 Act from making a further application under Part 4?
- Ground 2: Was On Tower’s application under Part 4 of the Code an abuse of process and should the reference be dismissed?
- Ground 3: Was On Tower prevented from serving a valid paragraph 20/27 notice on 17 February 2023 because its tenancy was still being continued by the 1954 Act?
- Conclusions
![[2024] UKUT 151 (LC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_lnJS4Uj.png)