[2024] UKUT 180 (LC)

Case No: LC-2023-759

AN APPEAL AGAINST A DECISION OF THE FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL (PROPERTY CHAMBER)

FTT REF: CHI/45UC/PHI/2023/0039-0043, CHI/45UC/PHI/2023/0045-0051

19 June 2024

TRIBUNALS, COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT ACT 2007

PARK HOMES – PITCH FEE REVIEW – validity of procedure – whether pitch fee review notice and pitch fee review form have to be different documents - requirements for signature by the site owner – reasons for displacement of the presumption that the pitch fee is to rise in line with the retail prices index – entitlement to receive a pitch fee

BETWEEN:

THE BEACHES MANAGEMENT LTD

Appellant

-and-

(1) MR D AND MRS J FURBEAR

(2) MS D FRAY (3) MRS S FELLOWS

(4) MR B CARTER AND MARS C GREEN-CARTER

(5) MR R SIMON (6) MRS J COX

(7) MR P AND MRS J BROWN

(8) The estate of MRS D ROSE

(9) MR G MAYES-JONES AND MS C MARCH

(10) MR AND MRS EDWARDS

(11) MRS L MARTIN (12) MISS S TIPLER

Respondent

1,2,8,12,14,19,20,21,22,23,24 and 27 Beechfield Park,

Hook Lane, Aldingbourne,

Chichester, West Sussex, PO20 3XX

Upper Tribunal Judge Elizabeth Cooke

13 June 2024

Mr David Sunderland for the appellant

Ms Caroline March for the respondents

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024

The following cases are referred to in this decision:

Vyse v Wyldecrest Parks (Management) Limited [2017] UKUT 24 (LC)

Wyldecrest Parks (Management) Limited v Truzzi-Franconi [2023] UKUT 42 (LC)