Introduction
Introduction
This is an appeal from the First-tier Tribunal’s determination of the pitch fee for the pitch where Mr Clark lives in his mobile home at Haldon Ridge, a site owned by the appellant, Teignbridge District Council. Permission to appeal was given by the FTT, and the appeal has been determined under the Tribunal’s written representations procedure. Mr Clark has chosen not to participate as a respondent and so I have had written representations only from the appellant, drafted by Mr Jonathan Ward of counsel, to whom I am grateful.
- Heading
- Introduction
- The factual and legal background
- The FTT’s decision
- The appeal
- Ground 1: was the decision irrational?
- Ground 2: the timing of the decrease in amenity and whether it had already been taken into account
- Ground 3: did the FTT exceed its discretion in considering the impact of the unusually high rise in the RPI?
- Conclusions
![[2024] UKUT 00279 (LC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_lnJS4Uj.png)