Heading

Case No: LC-2024-40
AN APPEAL AGAINST A DECISION OF THE FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL (PROPERTY CHAMBER)
FTT REF: MAN/OOBY/LBC/2022/0024 and others listed in the schedule
10 September 2024
TRIBUNALS, COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT ACT 2007
COSTS – CONDUCT - what amounts to “unreasonable conduct” for the purposes of rule 13(1)(b) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013 – failure to send a letter before action – issue of proceedings in the knowledge that the FTT had no jurisdiction
BETWEEN:
ZAID ALOTHMAN HOLDINGS LIMITED AND 75 OTHERS
Appellants
-and-
BETTER INTELLIGENT MANAGEMENT LIMITED AND
PHOENIX PLACE (LIVERPOOL) MANAGEMENT LIMITED
Respondents
Block A and Block B,
Phoenix Place,
5 Prince Edward Street,
Liverpool, L5 3AA
Upper Tribunal Judge Elizabeth Cooke
Decision on written representations
Mr Jonathan Upton for the appellants, instructed by Mishcon de Reya LLP
Mr David Gilchrist for the respondents, instructed by HM3 Legal
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024
The following cases are referred to in this decision:
Goodrich v Paisner and others [1956) WLR 1053
JLK Ltd v Ezekwe [2017] UKUT 277 (LC)
Q Studios (Stoke) RTM Co Ltd v Premier Ground Rents No 6 Ltd [2020] UKUT 197 (LC)
Ridehalgh v Horsefield [1994] EWCA Civ 40
Willow Court Management Company (1985) Ltd v Alexander [2016] UKUT 290 (LC)
- Heading
- Introduction
- The legal background
- The factual background
- The proceedings in the FTT
- The FTT’s power to award costs
- The application for costs and the FTT’s decision
- The appeal from the costs decision
- The Tribunal’s own decision on the appellants’ application for costs
- Should an order for costs be made?
- Conclusions
![[2024] UKUT 253 (LC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_lnJS4Uj.png)