Heading

Case No: LC-2024-199
AN APPEAL AGAINST A DECISION OF THE FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER AND AN APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
REF: LON/OOBN/HNA/2023/0046
Royal Courts of Justice,
Strand, London WC2A 2LL
7 January 2025
TRIBUNALS, COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT ACT 2007
HOUSING – CIVIL PENALTY – licensing offence – true meaning of local housing authority policy – whether policy “too rigid” – s.249A, Housing Act 2004 – appeal allowed
JUDICIAL REVIEW – FTT’s power to review and amend its own decisions – alternative remedy available to challenge illegitimate review by appeal – application refused
BETWEEN:
LONDON BOROUGH OF WALTHAM FOREST
Appellant
-and-
MARBLE PROPERTIES (LONDON) LIMITED
Respondent
AND BETWEEN:
LONDON BOROUGH OF WALTHAM FOREST
Claimant
-and-
THE FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL (PROPERTY CHAMBER)
Defendant
-and-
MARBLE PROPERTIES (LONDON) LIMITED
Interested Party
Martin Rodger KC, Deputy Chamber President
17 December 2024
Riccardo Calzavara, instructed by Sharpe Pritchard, for the appellant/claimant
Neither the respondent/interested party nor the defendant participated
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2024
The following cases are referred to in this decision:
AA Homes & Housing Ltd v LB Croydon [2020] UKUT 181 (LC)
Brewer v Mann [2012] EWCA Civ 246
JS v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] UKUT 100 (AAC)
Kazi v Bradford Metropolitan District Council [2024] EWCA Civ 1037
London Borough of Waltham Forest v Marshall [2020] UKUT 35 (LC)
MT (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] 2 AC 110
Point West GR Ltd v Bassi [2020] 1 WLR 4102
R (RB) v First-tier Tribunal [2010] MHLR 192
Sutton v Norwich City Council [2021] EWCA Civ 20
- Heading
- Introduction
- Legislation relevant to the appeal
- The Council’s policy
- The FTT’s first decision
- The FTT’s second decision and its grant of permission to appeal
- Issue 1: Did the FTT misinterpret the Council’s policy?
- Issue 3: Was the FTT entitled to give a further discount of 20%?
- The judicial review
- Issue 2 – Was the Council’s policy or its application in this case “too rigid”
- Conclusions
![[2025] UKUT 2 (LC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_lnJS4Uj.png)