Heading

Case No: LC-2024-792
AN APPEAL AGAINST A DECISION OF THE FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL (PROPRETY CHAMBER)
Ref: LON/OOAN/HMF/2024/2011
Royal Courts of Justice, Strand,
London, WC2A 2LL
4 June 2025
TRIBUNALS, COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT ACT 2007
HOUSING – RENT REPAYMENT ORDER – jurisdiction – licensing offence – whether application made within time – whether offence committed in “the period of 12 months ending with the day on which the application is made” – reasonable excuse – whether proper assessment of defence made and adequate reasons given for rejecting excuse – s.41(2)(b), Housing and Planning Act 2016 – appeal allowed
BETWEEN:
STEVAN GORGIEVSKI
Appellant
-and-
CARL GRIFFITHS (1)
JOSHUA SQUIRES (2)
MATTHEW FARRELL (3)
ROSS KERSLAKE (4)
WILLIAM CHURCHILL (5)
Respondents
4 Biscay Road,
London W6
Martin Rodger KC,
Deputy Chamber President
8 May 2025
Howard Lederman, instructed directly, for the appellant
Peter Eliot of Justice for Tenants, for the respondents
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025
The following cases are referred to in this decision:
Aly v Aly [1984] 1 WLR 936
Camden Borough Council v ADC Estates Ltd (1990) 61 P & CR 48
Jevan v Athansiadi [2024] UKUT 358
Marigold v Wells [2023] UKUT 33 (LC)
Moh v Rimal Properties Ltd [2024] UKUT 324 (LC)
- Heading
- Introduction
- Legal background
- Factual background
- The FTT’s decision
- The grounds of appeal
- Issue 1: Was the application made in time?
- Issue 2: The appellant’s reasonable excuse defence
- Issues 3 and 4: “Harassment” and the assessment of quantum
- Issue 5 – Relevance of offer of mediation
- Conclusions
![[2025] UKUT 161 (LC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_lnJS4Uj.png)