Heading

Case No: LC-2024-718
AN APPEAL AGAINST A DECISION OF THE VALUATION TRIBUNAL
FOR ENGLAND
Manchester Civil Justice Centre
9 July 2025
TRIBUNALS, COURTS AND ENFORCEMENT ACT 2007
RATING - VALUATION - modern office floors let in shell and “Category A” condition before fitting out by tenants to “Category B” - whether rateable value increased by tenant’s fitting out works from Category A to Category B – appropriate method of calculating uplift - appeals allowed
BETWEEN:
AMANDA HITCHINGS
(VALUATION OFFICER)
Appellant
-and-
SHOOSMITHS LLP (1)
MANDO GROUP LTD (2)
Respondents
PT 5th (East) and 6th Flrs, XYZ Building
2 Hardman Boulevard,
Manchester M3 3AQ
-and-
4th Floor, 5 St Pauls Square,
Liverpool L3 9SJ
Mr Mark Higgin FRICS FIRRV and Upper Tribunal Judge Elizabeth Cooke
1-2 May 2025
Ms Jenny Wigley KC and Mr Aaron Walder, instructed by HMRC Legal Group for the appellant
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025
The following cases were referred to in this decision:
Dawn Bunyan (VO) v Acenden Limited [2023] UKUT 17 (LC)
FR Evans (Leeds) Ltd v English Electric Co Ltd (1977) 36 P & CR 185
Hughes (VO) v York Museums and Gallery Trust [2017] UKUT 200 (LC)
London County Council v Erith and West Ham (Churchwardens and Overseers) [1893] AC 562
- Heading
- Introduction
- The legal and practical background
- The properties and the VTE decision
- The Mando Property
- The VTE decision
- The VO’s case in these appeals
- The Shoosmiths Property
- The Mando Property
- The Tribunal’s approach to valuation in these appeals
- The Shoosmiths Property in Manchester
- The rateable value of the Shoosmiths Property calculated by reference to the landlord’s payment for the cost of the Category B fitting out work
- Mr Brown’s calculation of the Category A value
- The comparable evidence for Category A lettings of Grade A office space in Manchester
- The comparable evidence for Category B lettings of Grade A office space in Manchester
- Our conclusions about the Shoosmiths Property
- The Mando Property in Liverpool
- The Category A rental market in Liverpool and the effective Category A rent for the Mando Property
- The amortised cost of the Category B fitting out at the Mando Property
- The Category B comparables
- The witnesses’ conclusions
- The Tribunal’s conclusion about the Mando Property
- Conclusions
![[2025] UKUT 224 (LC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_lnJS4Uj.png)