[2025] UKUT 292 (LC)

That the FTT should not have gone on to decide to exercise its discretion without first hearing evidence on the issue of “substantial prejudice” in section 38(6);

That the FTT was wrong to regard the provisions of the lease as unsatisfactory;

That the FTT was wrong to regard the RTM company’s financial circumstances as relevant; and

(if the previous grounds fail) that the FTT erred in its consideration of the evidence.