Parties’ submissions in outline
Parties’ submissions in outline
Ms Brown does not disagree with the UT’s approach of interpreting the words “party to” in their statutory and factual context but argues that for a number of reasons that the UT’s analysis on that context was wrong. Her overall submission, made by reference to the wider statutory context and the explanatory notes for the Finance Bill which brought in the relevant ITA 2007 provisions, together with the ordinary meaning of the words “party to”, is that the words should be construed narrowly. HMRC’s case, as submitted by Miss Hughes, is simply that Coconut UT is directly on point, correct and should be followed and applied to dismiss the appeal.
- Heading
- Introduction
- Background
- Grounds of appeal by hoopla
- Grounds 1 and 2 – interpretation and application of “party to”
- Coconut UT
- Parties’ submissions in outline
- Discussion
- Explanatory notes to Finance Bill 2012
- Ordinary meaning / OED definition
- Distinction between being “Party to” part of arrangements vs “party to” all of arrangements ?
- Ground 3 – payments to Entertainment in return for provision of services, as arm’s length commercial sub-contracting could not be amounts which “in the course of arrangements, [were] paid to or for th
- Conclusions
![UT/2023/000055 - [2025] UKUT 00028 (TCC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_ICfrj4g.png)