Upper Tribunal Tax and Chancery Chamber
UT (Tax & Chancery) UT/2023/00099 - [2025] UKUT 00013 (TCC)
Fecha: 22-Oct-2024
FIRST GROUND OF APPEAL
FIRST GROUND OF APPEAL
As set out at the beginning of this Decision, the First Ground of Appeal was that the FTT erred in law when it held that the FTT Grounds did not include, as one of the grounds, that the Appellant held valid VAT invoices at the time of HMRC’s decision.
- Heading
- Introduction
- Background
- The period before the assessments
- HMRC’s letter of 7 January 2019
- Subsequent correspondence regarding provision of evidence
- The assessments
- Further correspondence
- Review decision
- The Appellant’s grounds of appeal to the FTT
- The FTT’s findings and conclusions
- The Law
- European law
- Domestic statute and secondary legislation
- Appeal rights against HMRC’s assessments
- Relevant case law
- FIRST GROUND OF APPEAL
- Appellant’s submissions
- HMRC’s submissions
- The FTT Rules and the case law
- Discussion and conclusion
- SECOND GROUND OF APPEAL
- The case law on jurisdiction
- Petroma
- Boyce
- Scandico
- The Appellant’s submissions
- Discussion and analysis
- The facts
- Application of the law to the facts
- The Gora principle
- The substantive appeal
- Implications
- Conclusions