Scope of the appeal
Scope of the appeal
The decision of HMRC which forms the subject matter of this appeal came in response to a request from Bolt in a letter dated 4 October 2022 for a non-statutory ruling in relation to the VAT treatment of mobile ride-hailing services. The services which were the subject of that request were on-demand, private hire passenger transport services provided by Bolt as principal, ordered and paid for through a smartphone application.
As noted at FTT [7] and [8], Bolt also provides other services, including scheduled rides that can be booked in advance. However, the request for the ruling and HMRC’s response were limited to Bolt’s on-demand services. On that basis, the FTT restricted its decision to the treatment of on-demand services. In reaching its decision, however, the FTT considered it appropriate to consider whether the supplies made by a private hire vehicle operator acting as principal more generally fall within the TOMS. We adopt the same approach.
- Heading
- Introduction
- Scope of the appeal
- Relevant legislation
- Facts
- Mr Ryan’s evidence
- The FTT Decision
- The parties confirmed at the hearing before us that these items remained common ground between them
- The Grounds of Appeal
- Issue 1: services of a kind commonly provided by tour operators or travel agents
- The parties’ submissions in outline
- Discussion
- Principles derived from the CJEU case law
- Ground 1: the high-level approach
- Grounds 1a, 2 and 2a: the alternative reasons for the FTT’s conclusion
- Ground 3: multiplicity of supplies
- Conclusions
![UT/2024/000008 - [2025] UKUT 00100 (TCC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_ICfrj4g.png)