![UT (Tax & Chancery) UT-2023-000064 - [2024] UKUT 00394 (TCC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_ICfrj4g.png){kind=logo}
Upper Tribunal Tax and Chancery Chamber
UT (Tax & Chancery) UT-2023-000064 - [2024] UKUT 00394 (TCC)
Fecha: 19-Nov-2024
Ground (vii) – inaccuracies
Ground (vii) – inaccuracies
The Applicant suggests substantive errors arise in respect of paragraphs 9A, 40B, 52, 52C, 55, 73, and 165.4.of the ASOC.
The Authority accepts that there is an error at paragraph 52C which will be corrected. The Authority disputes that there are errors in the other paragraphs. In those circumstances, I agree with the Authority that the appropriate response to the errors is for Mr Staley to deal with them in his amended Reply.
Accordingly, I permit these amendments to be made, subject to the Authority correcting the error in paragraph 52C.
- Heading
- Introduction
- Background to the reference
- The reference proceedings to date
- The pleadings as currently filed
- Mr Staley’s Reply to the Statement of Case
- The Potential Witnesses Application
- The Evidence in Chief Application
- The US Proceedings
- US Proceedings documents and Epstein Estate Emails
- Mr Staley’s position
- Relevant Legal Principles
- The Tribunal’s discretion to allow amendments
- The proposed amendments
- Ground (i) - introduction of new allegations
- Ground (ii) - unnecessary citation of evidence
- Ground (iii) - correspondence between the Authority and the Applicant’s lawyers – no probative value
- Ground (iv) – email correspondence and by imessaging between Mr Epstein and third parties
- Ground (v) - no probative value
- Ground (vi) – failure to characterise the evidence in an accurate, balanced or objective manner
- Ground (vii) – inaccuracies
- The Authority’s List of Documents
- Conclusions