UT (Tax & Chancery) UT/2022/000099 - [2024] UKUT 00184 (TCC)
Fecha: 24-Abr-2024
The FTT Rules
The FTT Rules
Rule 10 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009 (“the FTT Rules”) is headed “Orders for costs”, and so far as relevant to this case, reads as follows:
The Tribunal may only make an order in respect of costs…—
…
if the Tribunal considers that a party or their representative has acted unreasonably in bringing, defending or conducting the proceedings; . . .
if—
the proceedings have been allocated as a Complex case under rule 23 (allocation of cases to categories); and
the taxpayer…has not sent or delivered a written request to the Tribunal, within 28 days of receiving notice that the case had been allocated as a Complex case, that the proceedings be excluded from potential liability for costs or expenses under this sub-paragraph; or
…
The Tribunal may make an order under paragraph (1) on an application or of its own initiative.
A person making an application for an order under paragraph (1) must—
send or deliver a written application to the Tribunal and to the person against whom it is proposed that the order be made; and
send or deliver with the application a schedule of the costs or expenses claimed in sufficient detail to allow the Tribunal to undertake a summary assessment of such costs or expenses if it decides to do so.
(4)-(5) ….
The amount of costs (or, in Scotland, expenses) to be paid under an order under paragraph (1) may be ascertained by—
summary assessment by the Tribunal;
agreement of a specified sum by the paying person and the person entitled to receive the costs or expenses (the “receiving person”); or
assessment of the whole or a specified part of the costs or expenses[, including the costs or expenses of the assessment,] incurred by the receiving person, if not agreed.
Following an order for assessment under paragraph (6)(c) the paying person or the receiving person may apply—
in England and Wales, to a county court, the High Court or the Costs Office of the Supreme Court (as specified in the order) for a detailed assessment of the costs on the standard basis or, if specified in the order, on the indemnity basis; and the Civil Procedure Rules 1998 shall apply, with necessary modifications, to that application and assessment as if the proceedings in the tribunal had been proceedings in a court to which the Civil Procedure Rules 1998 apply; …”
- Heading
- Introduction and summary
- The FTT Rules
- CPR 44
- The Background
- The Costs Decision
- The starting point
- The CPR case law
- The approach under the FTT Rules
- Submissions and discussion
- The UT’s jurisdiction
- Remaking the costs decision
- HMRC’s success
- Case law guidance on conduct issues
- The FTT’s findings relating to HMRC’s conduct
- The FTT’s findings about Mr Donaldson
- The parties’ submissions
- Conclusion
- Conclusions