UT’s jurisdiction in relation to appeals from the FTT
UT’s jurisdiction in relation to appeals from the FTT
An appeal to the Upper Tribunal from a decision of the FTT can only be made on a point of law (section 11 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007). The Upper Tribunal has a discretion whether to give permission to appeal. It will be exercised to grant permission if there is a realistic (as opposed to fanciful) prospect of an appeal succeeding, or if there is, exceptionally, some other good reason to do so: Lord Woolf MR in Smith v Cosworth Casting Processes Ltd [1997] 1 WLR 1538.
It is therefore the practice of this Chamber of the Upper Tribunal to grant permission to appeal where the grounds of appeal disclose an arguable error of law in the FTT’s decision which is material to the outcome of the case or if there is some other compelling reason to do so.
- Heading
- JUDGE RUPERT JONES Introduction
- UT’s jurisdiction in relation to appeals from the FTT
- Grounds of Appeal
- GROUND 1 – procedural unfairness (Rules 2, 29 and 30 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009 (“FTT Rules 2009”))
- GROUND 2 – the FTT misdirected itself when applying the test for ‘deliberate accuracy’
- Ground 1b) – failure to adopt an inquisitorial approach
- Ground 2 –the FTT misdirected itself when applying the test for ‘deliberate accuracy’
- Ground 3 - the FTT failed to give adequate reasons for penalty findings
- Conclusion on grounds
- Conclusions
![[2025] UKUT 00377 (TCC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_ICfrj4g.png)