Heading

Case Number: UT/2023/000126
Rolls Building, London
Income Tax - discovery assessments and penalties imposed by National Crime Agency (“NCA”) adopting Revenue functions – whether FTT erred in not requiring NCA to meet a burden of showing loss of tax arising from trade of money laundering – effect of section 319 POCA 2005 – whether FTT entitled to find that there was a loss of tax – whether FTT entitled to find that the Second Appellant brought about a loss of tax deliberately – appeal dismissed
Judgment date: 9 May 2025
Before
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE SWAMI RAGHAVAN
UPPER TRIBUAL JUDGE JONATHAN CANNAN
Between
MOHAMMED BUTT
MAHFOOZ BEGUM
Appellants
and
NATIONAL CRIME AGENCY
Respondent
Representation:
For the Appellants: Laurent Sykes KC and Ben Blades, Counsel, instructed by Aliant Law
For the Respondents: Sarah Black, Counsel, instructed by the National Crime Agency
DECISION
- Heading
- Introduction
- Legislative provisions
- Background Facts and FTT decision
- The FTT hearing and Decision
- Grounds of Appeal
- Ground 1 –the NCA’s burden in relation to loss of tax
- Ground 2 – section 319 poca
- Ground 3 - edwards v Bairstow challenge
- Ground 4 –rental income
- Ground 5 – whether Mrs Begum brought about the loss of tax deliberately
- Conclusions
![UT/2023/000126 - [2025] UKUT 00145 (TCC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_ICfrj4g.png)