The Deficit Claim could not be quantified
The Deficit Claim could not be quantified
There are a number of strands in the Claimant’s argument that it was not able to quantify the Deficit Claim. As to an argument that this was not possible as a matter of law until the Dividends were brought into charge, we have already indicated that this argument is to be rejected. In respect of how practicable it was to quantify the claim, the Claimant points to i) the extent to which it remained unclear through the course of the FII Litigation that the solution to EU law compatibility was not exemption but credit at the level of the FNR ii) the complexity of determining the FNR which applied in the Claimant’s case iii) the need to seek HMRC’s agreement to the FNR (which was only achieved in April 2021). We address these in turn.
- Heading
- Introduction
- Background to JR claim
- law – summary of statutory background
- The Statement of Practice
- HMRC’s Business Brief and further exchanges
- The Decision
- Summary of Grounds
- Powers of judicial review
- Correct approach to construction of Statements of Practice
- Claimant’s Grounds of judicial review
- Discussion of Ground One
- Application of correct interpretation of example to facts
- Ground Two – application of alternative condition (dependency on discussions with inspector ongoing)
- Ground Three
- Discussion
- The Deficit Claim could not be quantified
- When it became clear foreign dividends non-exempt and that credit was for FNR
- Difficulties in establishing and agreeing FNR which applied in Claimant’s case
- Revenue’s 2020 Business Brief
- Other points
- Ground Four and Five not necessary for our decision on the claim
- Ground Four
- Error in assuming claim could be made before any closure notice brought profits into charge
- Claimant’s submissions on 2025 Post-Prudential CA
- Error of law in failing to realise claim to set off NTLRD must be quantified and claim could only be quantified once FNR agreed
- Failure to take account of relevant considerations
- Discussion
- Ground Five
- Conclusions
![UT/2024/000060 - [2025] UKUT 00143 (TCC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_ICfrj4g.png)