UT (Tax & Chancery) UT-2024-000024 - [2025] UKUT 00156 (TCC)
Fecha: 18-Mar-2025
Heading

UT (Tax & Chancery) Case Number: UT-2024-000024
Hearing venue: The Rolls Building
London EC4A 1NL
Judgment date: 27 May 2025
STAMP DUTY LAND TAX - procedural requirements under Schedule 10, Finance Act 2003 where ineffective avoidance arrangements caught by s.75A - Enquiry Appeal - validity of notices of enquiry - understanding of reasonable recipient - Assessment Appeal - validity of discovery assessments made under extended time limit in paragraph 31(2A)(b) - whether Appellants failed to file a return in respect of the notional transaction pursuant to s75A
Before
JUDGE RUPERT JONES
JUDGE JONATHAN CANNAN
Between
(1) GIOVANNI SCATOLA AND AMY SCATOLA
(2) PAUL BERMER AND HELEN KATHERINE STODDART
(3) ADRIAN BIRCH AND JAYNE BIRCH
Appellants / Cross Respondents
and
THE COMMISSIONERS FOR HIS MAJESTY’S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS
Respondents / Cross Appellants
Representation:
For the Appellants: Mr Thomas Chacko of counsel instructed by Spector, Constant and Williams solicitors
For the Respondents: Mr Ben Elliott of counsel instructed by the General Counsel and Solicitor for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Heading
- INTRODUCTION
- ENQUIRY APPEAL
- A closure notice must either—
- A closure notice takes effect when it is issued.”
- The FTT Decision
- The FTT’s conclusion on the validity of the enquiry notices
- Overview of the parties’ cases
- Outline of HMRC’s case
- Discussion and Analysis
- Ground 2 – Notices of enquiry were ambiguous
- Section 83(2) FA 2003
- THE ASSESSMENT APPEAL
- The Legislation
- This section applies where–
- Where this section applies–
- The effective date of the notional transaction is–
- Notifiable Transactions
- A land transaction is notifiable if it is–
- Assessments
- Conclusions