Heading

Case Number: UT/2024/000022
Rolls Building, London
PROCEDURE – application for permission to make a late appeal in relation to Personal Liability Notice – stage three of approach suggested in Martland v HMRC - whether FTT erred in failing to take account of various relevant factors and to properly identify relevant principles regarding attribution of adviser’s failure to those of litigant - no – whether FTT erred in according particular weight to the importance of time limits – yes – decision set aside and remade - appeal dismissed
Written submissions: 13 and 19 August 2025
Judgment date: 17 September 2025
Before
JUDGE SWAMI RAGHAVAN
JUDGE NICHOLAS PAINES KC
Between
TAJINDER PAWAR
Appellant
and
THE COMMISSIONERS FOR HIS MAJESTY’S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS
Respondents
Representation:
For the Appellant: David Bedenham KC and Christopher McNall, Counsel, instructed by SP Legal Solutions
For the Respondents: Jenny Goldring, Counsel, instructed by the General Counsel and Solicitor to His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
DECISION
![UT/2024/000022 - [2025] UKUT 00309 (TCC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_ICfrj4g.png)