Heading

Case Number: UT/2024/000069
UT/2024/000082
Rolls Building, London, EC4
Value added tax and national insurance contributions – power to de-register a company for VAT purposes pursuant to CJEU decision in Ablessiowhere there was a VAT fraud – whether requirement that the directors of company must have known, or should have known, of the fraud – no – whether the pleading by HMRC about the fraud was sufficient – yes
Judgment date: 17 July 2025
Before
MR JUSTICE RAJAH
JUDGE ANDREW SCOTT
Between
(1) ELPHYSIC LIMITED
(2) PHYARREIDON LIMITED
(3) ROSSCANA LIMITED
(4) ZRAYTUMBIAX LIMITED
Appellants/ Respondents
and
THE COMMISSIONERS FOR HIS MAJESTY’S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS
Respondents/ Appellants
Representation:
For the Appellants/ Respondents: Mr Margolin KC and Mr MacWhannell of, and Mr Bedenham KC of counsel instructed by, Joseph Hage Aaronson LLP
For the Respondents/ Appellants: Mr Puzey and Mr Millington, instructed by the General Counsel and Solicitor to His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
DECISION
- Heading
- Introduction
- Relevant law
- The FTT’s decision
- HMRC’s appeal on the application of the Ablessio principle
- Relevant CJEU case law about abuse: Halifax and Kittel
- The decision in Ablessio etc
- Domestic authorities
- Discussion
- Ground 1: adequacy of the pleading by HMRC
- The Lead Appellants’ case
- HMRC’s pleading
- No plea of identity of perpetrator
- Was a plea or a finding of identity of perpetrator necessary?
- Ground 2: the FTT’s finding of fraud without naming anyone
- Conclusions
![UT/2024/000069 - [2025] UKUT 00236 (TCC)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_ICfrj4g.png)