Case No. CO-2850-2005

93.In my judgment and for the reasons which already appear, no legitimate aim within the ambit of Article 10(2) ECHR is identifiable in the decision, nor is any referred to in the communications from the defendant. 94.The letter dated 13th April 2005 implied a need to adhere to the policy of the UK government in its treatment of the TRNC and a basis for the decision was the “substantial health warning” allegedly given by the FCO in respect of travel to North Cyprus. Cyprus (including the North) is not a country where the FCO advises that no or only essential travel should be undertaken. On the contrary, the FCO envisages that travel may be undertaken to North Cyprus.