Erasure
Erasure
Erasing a doctor’s name from the medical register may be imposed where this is the only means of protecting the public (para 107). Erasure may be appropriate even where the doctor does not present a risk to patient safety but where this action is necessary to maintain public confidence in the profession (para 108). Factors indicating that erasure is appropriate include offences involving violence (para 109g) and “persistent lack of insight into the seriousness of [the doctor’s] actions or the consequences” (para 109j).
More generally, a person made subject to a suspended sentence of imprisonment will not necessarily receive a sanction of suspension from the register rather than erasure. A suspended sentence of imprisonment marks serious criminality in that it cannot be imposed unless the offence reaches the custody threshold.
- Heading
- Introduction
- Legal framework
- Sanctions guidance
- Proportionality
- Mitigating and aggravating factors
- Treatment of criminal convictions
- Suspension
- Erasure
- GMC Policy: Good Medical Practice
- The facts
- Proceedings before the MPT
- Remorse
- Insight
- Risk of repetition
- Impairment
- Sanction
- Appellant’s overarching submissions
- The approach of the Guidance to violent offences
- MPT’s approach to insight and remorse
- Ground 1: Failure to balance aggravating and mitigating factors appropriately
- Ground 2: Failure to apply the Guidance and precedents correctly
- Other cases
- Guidance
- Public perception
- Ground 3: Error in the determination of sanction
- Seriousness of offending
- Insight and remediation
- Conclusions
![AC-2025-CDF-000062 - [2025] EWHC 2619 (Admin)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_fi51A75.png)