Conclusions
Conclusions
I will dismiss the appeal by Dr Foy on all grounds.
I will grant the GMC’s appeal on ground 6 and dismiss their appeal on all other grounds.
Whilst the Panel ruled that suspension was the appropriate sanction, despite the Panel considering that the misconduct of Dr Foy bought him close to the line over which erasure would have been necessary, I consider that the appropriate sanction should be reconsidered by a Panel as soon as is practicable hereafter. Until that time Dr Foy should remain suspended from registration.
- Heading
- The Parties and reporting
- The Panel’s decision, in summary
- The Appeals, in summary
- The Issues
- The Chronology of facts found and some evidence
- The Panel’s Judgment
- The Grounds of Appeal – Dr Foy
- GMC submissions on Grounds 1 and 2 (i), (ii), (v) – credibility of Ms A
- Ground 2(iv), no evidence at all
- Ground 2 (vi), inadequate or absent reasons
- Serious procedural irregularities
- The GMC appeal relating to finding of fact
- The Law
- The Appeal procedure and the test
- Analysis of each of Dr Foy’s Grounds
- The GMC appeal
- Sanction
- The Issues
- Conclusions
![AC-2025-LON-000408 - [2025] EWHC 2846 (Admin)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_fi51A75.png)