The Issues
The Issues
As a result of my decisions above, the key issues are determined as follows:
The bedroom incident on 20.11.2018
The Panel was not wrong to find that Dr Foy had a reasonable belief that Ms A would consent to being touched on the breast (the GMC appeal).
The Sofa incident on 2.12.2018
The Panel was not wrong to find that Dr Foy had a reasonable belief that Ms A would consent to her breast being touched as they lay together on the sofa (the GMC appeal).
Both incidents
The Panel was not wrong to rely on Ms A’s credibility and accept her version of events about the Sofa Incident despite their findings that she had been doubly untruthful about her thesis and other matters and her contradictory evidence (the Foy appeal).
There was no serious procedural irregularity in the hearing before the Panel relating to Ms A’s medical records on SDT testing, the burden of proof and some witness transcripts (the Foy appeal).
Misconduct/impairment/Sanction
The Panel was not wrong to exclude patient status and close personal relationship from their consideration of misconduct in relation to the Bedroom Incident, they assessed his conduct as charged (the GMC appeal).
The Panel was wrong in its findings on risk and impairment on public protection grounds and hence the sanction needs to be reconsidered (the GMC appeal).
- Heading
- The Parties and reporting
- The Panel’s decision, in summary
- The Appeals, in summary
- The Issues
- The Chronology of facts found and some evidence
- The Panel’s Judgment
- The Grounds of Appeal – Dr Foy
- GMC submissions on Grounds 1 and 2 (i), (ii), (v) – credibility of Ms A
- Ground 2(iv), no evidence at all
- Ground 2 (vi), inadequate or absent reasons
- Serious procedural irregularities
- The GMC appeal relating to finding of fact
- The Law
- The Appeal procedure and the test
- Analysis of each of Dr Foy’s Grounds
- The GMC appeal
- Sanction
- The Issues
- Conclusions
![AC-2025-LON-000408 - [2025] EWHC 2846 (Admin)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_fi51A75.png)