![AC-2023-LON-003019 - [2025] EWHC 1851 (Admin)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_fi51A75.png){kind=logo}
Submissions
Submissions
On behalf of the Appellant Ms Hill submitted that a prima facie case of abuse arises from the failure of the German authorities to provide the prima facie evidence required by Israeli law and requested by the Israeli authorities and their subsequent refusal to explain the failure to seek the Appellant’s extradition from Israel. The Judge was wrong to conclude otherwise. Ms Hill pointed to Article 87 of the Interpol Rules on the Processing of Data (2019) which provides that after being notified of the location of a suspected person the requesting country ‘shall act immediately’ and ‘ensure the swift transmission of data and supporting documents’ requested.
- Heading
- Mrs Justice Thornton DBE
- The extent of the Appellant’s mental and physical health difficulties
- The evidential backdrop
- The Judge’s preference for the evidence of Professor Fazel
- Ground 1 – Section 25
- Submissions on behalf of the Appellant
- Analysis of Ground 1
- Ground 2: Article 8 European Convention on Human Rights
- Submissions on behalf of the Appellant
- Analysis of Ground 2
- Ground 3 Abuse of process
- Submissions
- Analysis of Ground 3
- Diagnosis of epilepsy
- Fibromyalgia
- Colorectal/pelvic floor conditions
- Hospitalisation
- The need for physiotherapy
- Risks of a further head injury
- The Appellant’s mental health
- Prison conditions – antisemitism
- Conclusions