![AC-2025-LON-002122 - [2025] EWHC 2013 (Admin)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_fi51A75.png){kind=logo}
Heading
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL
Before :
MR JUSTICE CHAMBERLAIN
Between :
THE KING on the application of HUDA AMMORI | Claimant |
- and - | |
SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT | Defendant |
Raza Husain KC, Blinne Ní Ghrálaigh KC, Paul Luckhurst, Owen Greenhall, Audrey Cherryl Mogan, Mira Hammad and Grant Kynaston (instructed by Birnberg Peirce Solicitors) for the Claimant
James Eadie KC, David Blundell KC, Ben Watson KC, Stephen Kosmin, Andrew Deakin and Karl Laird (instructed by the Government Legal Department) for the Defendant
Tim Buley KC, Dominic Lewis and Jesse Nicholls (instructed by the Special Advocate Support Office) as Special Advocates
Hearing dates: 21 July 2025
Approved Judgment
This judgment was handed down in Court 72 at 2pm on Wednesday 30July 2025.
Mr Justice Chamberlain:
- Heading
- Introduction
- Background
- Further evidence
- Preliminary issue
- The alternative remedy point
- Discussion
- The test to be applied in assessing whether an alternative remedy is adequate
- Factor (1): Timing
- Factor (2): The nature of the detriment
- Factor (3): Criminal cases
- Factor (4): Forum and procedure
- Factor (5): Would the availability of judicial review render the deproscription/POAC route a dead letter?
- The Kurdistan Workers’ Party case
- Conclusion
- The claimant’s grounds of challenge
- Ground 2
- Ground 1
- Ground 3
- Ground 4
- Ground 5
- Ground 6
- Ground 7
- Ground 8
- Conclusions