BR-2024-000761 - [2025] EWHC 2900 (Ch)

The same facts and conclusions I reach in respect of the Misrepresentation argument.

There is a genuine and substantial dispute as to whether it was reasonable to believe that Mr Leahy intended to rely on the representations made by SIA through its directors or agents; whether the representations were substantially untrue and amount to misrepresentations; and if, as a matter of fact Mr Leahy was induced execute the unlimited personal guarantee.

These findings make it unnecessary to consider whether there is a genuine and substantial dispute that the representations created a collateral contract.