Grounds 3 and 4
Grounds 3 and 4
In considering the third and fourth grounds of appeal I myself must consider whether the strike out/summary judgment tests are met by the Defendant. In doing so, I have considered carefully the above summary taken from the skeleton arguments before me and reminded myself of the notes to the two provisions in question as set out in the White Book.
The Judge appears to have dismissed the Defendant’s application on the basis that there was a real prospect of success on the limitation defence and that there were the factual (and in the case of (i) below, mixed questions of fact and law) issues that he referred to at paragraph 12 of his judgment which he could not resolve namely:
“i. Do the exceptions to the limitation period such as fraud, mistake,
and/or concealment apply?
- Heading
- Introduction
- The Procedural History
- The evidence generally
- The facts and the documents
- “Part 2: General Provisions” contains the following (among other provisions) “8. Law of the Plan Policies - England
- The complaint to the Irish Financial Services Ombudsman 2012
- Fresh complaints by Mr Dewji: June 2021 onwards
- The Re-amended Particulars of claim in this case
- Alleged breaches of Conduct of Business Rules
- The application before Mr Recorder Kelly KC
- The judgment of the Recorder
- The Grounds of Appeal
- Ground 1: discussion and determination
- Ground 2: discussion and determination
- Grounds 3 and 4
- When did the defendant know the essential relevant facts? Was it
- The Law Limitation
- Res judicata/abuse of process
- The taking out of the Policy in 2000
- Section 21
- Section 22
- Conclusion
- Conclusions
![CH-2025-000032 - [2025] EWHC 2988 (Ch)](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_O3rEzCI.png)