CR-2024-000675 - [2025] EWHC 2069 (Ch)
Chancery Division of the High Court

CR-2024-000675 - [2025] EWHC 2069 (Ch)

Fecha: 04-Ago-2025

The position of the Second Respondent

The position of the Second Respondent.

33.

I can deal with this relatively briefly. In correspondence, the Respondents have now accepted that Ms Dubylovska had no executive role in the Company. It has been alleged she was a non-executive director and that therefore she was entitled to some remuneration when making strategic decisions. This is not accepted by the Liquidators because they say there is no material, formal or informal, to suggest that she made or was involved in any strategic decisions on behalf of the Company. At the very least, they say there is nothing to justify the payments to her detailed in Category B. Throughout it should be remembered this was just a holding company.