BL-2023-MAN-000072 - [2025] EWHC 2442 (Ch)

I am satisfied that Together has satisfied on the evidence the various requirements of its case in rectification, and that clause 13 of the Deed of Postponement ought to be rectified so that it reads as referred to in paragraph 63 above if, contrary to my primary submission, clause 13 falls to be construed in the way contended by JAK.