Revocation for non-use: relevant principles
Revocation for non-use: relevant principles
Section 46(1)(a) and (b) give effect to the “use it or lose it” principle which is a feature of most trade mark laws. EU and UK law enable a registration to be revoked where there has been no genuine use of the trade mark or an acceptable variant for five years. The burden of proving use lies upon the proprietor of the registration. Two aspects of the law concerning revocation for non-use are relevant to this appeal. The first is use of variant forms of the trade mark as registered (section 46(2)). The second is partial revocation of the specification (section 46(5)).
- Heading
- Introduction
- The parties
- The Easylife Marks
- The Defendants’ Signs
- The Defendants’ Mark
- The issues in broad outline
- The legislative framework
- Assessment of the likelihood of confusion: basic principles
- Revocation for non-use: relevant principles
- Variant forms
- Partial revocation
- The average consumer
- Counterclaim for revocation of the Easylife Stylised Mark
- Claim for infringement: the Easylife Stylised Mark
- Claim for infringement: the Easylife Word Mark
- Standard of review on appeal
- Order of consideration
- The Defendants’ grounds of cross-appeal
- Cross-appeal ground 1: variant forms
- Cross-appeal ground 2: partial revocation
- easyGroup’s grounds of appeal
- The Defendants’ respondents’ notice
- Appeal ground 1: conceptual similarity
- Respondents’ notice grounds 1 and 2: comparison of services
- Appeal ground 2: enhanced distinctive character
- Respondents’ notice grounds 3 and 4: enhanced distinctive character
- Appeal ground 3: likelihood of confusion
- Re-assessment of likelihood of confusion
- Conclusions
![CA-2024-002240 - [2025] EWCA Civ 946](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_Sjvxvlx.png)