CA-2024-00277 - [2025] EWCA Civ 1000

So far as relevant to the issues on the appeals, the judge’s findings and assessments may be summarised as follows. The order adopted in this summary reflects the order of the grounds of appeal. It should be explained that, when it came to infringement pursuant to section 10(2), the judge grouped easyGroup’s allegations by reference to the relevant dates of assessment: November 2005/May 2007, September 2009, September 2015 and June 2022. I shall not follow that approach. This is not because there was anything wrong with it, but because easyGroup’s case on appeal is more limited as explained above and because neither side suggested that the differences in the dates were material to the issues on the appeal. Partly due to his chronological approach, the judge also addressed the infringement allegations concerning @easyuk separately from the other Defendants’ Signs. In this respect I shall follow the judge’s example.