Application to adduce fresh evidence
Application to adduce fresh evidence
I pause here to note that the wife invited us on this appeal to admit a further witness statement containing her evidence. We read it de bene esse. It provided an update of her circumstances, and specifically her continuing connection to London. It is not in fact in dispute that the wife continues to live in London, and has done so since (at the latest) January 2016. We indicated that we would not admit that evidence unless we were minded to allow the appeal, and only then if necessary on the issue of disposal. As it happens, it has not been necessary to consider the fresh evidence.
- Heading
- Introduction
- Summary of the legal principles discussed in this appeal
- Background facts
- Application to adduce fresh evidence
- The statutory scheme as at November 2019
- Agbaje v Agbaje [2010] UKSC 13
- Judgment of Cohen J: November 2019: (Potanina (FD2))
- Judgment: Court of Appeal: May 2021: Potanina (CA1)
- Judgment: Supreme Court: January 2024: Potanina (SC)
- Grounds of Appeal
- The arguments on this appeal
- The test for leave under section 13 of the 1984 Act
- Ground of Appeal [13]: Discussion
- Ground of Appeal [12]: Discussion
- Conclusions
![CA-2024-001698 - [2025] EWCA Civ 1136](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_Sjvxvlx.png)