![202303262 B1 - [2025] EWCA Crim 1163](https://backend.juristeca.com/files/emisores/logo_sHeHK8V.png){kind=logo}
The grounds of appeal
The grounds of appeal:
The applicant initially put forward eight grounds of appeal. All were rejected by the single judge. Four are no longer pursued, and we need say no more about them. The grounds which have been renewed to the full court challenge the judge’s rulings summarised in paragraphs 23-34 above. They are:
The judge was wrong to rule that the prosecution could adduce evidence of the March 2021 convictions.
The judge was wrong to rule that the prosecution could adduce evidence of the applicant’s bail conditions.
The judge was wrong to prohibit the defence from cross-examining the officer in the case about “the suspect”.
The judge was wrong to rule that the prosecution could adduce exhibit DR/15 in its entirety.
- Heading
- Lord Justice Holroyde
- The applicant
- Summary of the facts
- The criminal proceedings
- The judge’s rulings: 1 - the applicant’s previous convictions
- The judge’s rulings: 2 - the applicant’s bail conditions
- The judge’s rulings: 3 - cross-examination about “the suspect”
- The judge’s rulings: 4 - the NVIDIA threat intelligence report
- The grounds of appeal
- The submissions to this court
- Analysis
- Conclusion on grounds of appeal
- Persons found unfit to plead: representation and funding on appeal
- Analysis
- Conclusions